They do it with their friends

As a drunk waitress, you’re one of us — you’re a human, and humans, there’s are a lot of people that have opinions or ideas on things, they’re just not good at articulating it (or they never learned how to articulate it). But everyone does what we do (or everybody can do what we do) — they do it with their friends, they talk with their friends, they bullshit about stuff … and, you know, it’s just a process of putting it out there.

JRE 2270 Bridget Phetasy [ 1:58:12 – 1:58:39 ]

For more about publicacy, see “What is Publicacy + Why does it Matter?” [ https://socio.business.blog/2024/04/29/what-is-publicacy-why-does-it-matter ]

For more about mainstream milieus, see “Mainstream Milieus” [ https://socio.business.blog/2025/02/01/mainstream-milieus ]

For more about reliable sources of information concerning thought, ideas, opinions, etc. see “Rational Media” [ https://phlat.design.blog/2024/01/14/rational-media ]

Who in their right mind thought it would be a good idea to use the internet as your input source?

Keywords: {0}

A Google spokesperson tells CBS News for health queries, we’ve always had strong quality and safety guardrails in place including disclaimers that remind people that it’s important to seek out expert advice, but not all of it. CBS News confirmed that some health misinformation persists on the tool queries about introducing solid foods to infants under six months old, still returned tips in late June when we tested it searches on the health benefits of dubious wellness trends like detoxes or drinking raw milk included debunked claims.

Adam Curry, “No Agenda” #1680 [ https://www.noagendashow.net/listen/1680 ], Chapter “AI health” 2:06:02 – 2:06:08 (2:06:08 – 2:06:50 CBS News quote)

See also: “Quantity vs. Quality (Upside-Down Version)” [ https://socio.business.blog/2024/07/28/quantity-vs-quality-upside-down-version ]

Other search engines are far superior to Google

Keywords: Corruption , 2020 US Presidential Election , Censorship , Fake News , Google , Media Censorship , Propaganda

Not many realize that the information they are seeking on Google is censored, filtered, and deliberately presented to users in certain areas to align with its interests. Google heavily lobbies governments globally, but has an extreme sway over politicians within the establishment on the right and left.

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/corruption/google-and-election-interference

BTW: I just posted something related .. and for a short moment it seemed like a very dystopian fiction story … but then (in the end) I was shocked that it actually seemed quite realistic! 😯 (See “Would You Rather Choose a Book or Pick a Card?” [ https://socio.business.blog/2024/03/25/would-you-rather-choose-a-book-or-pick-a-card ] )

Messing around

Wow! Gushing appreciation really feels wonderful. 🙂

Let me back up a bit. Some people don’t have an appreciation of language quite like mine. Most people. Almost all people. Maybe I’m strange.

Quite a few people (2, to be exact, I think) have gotten upset about how this blog has cited their work. Maybe about half of them have mentioned the name of this blog as objectionable.

I wonder how many people understand the way this term is used (colloquially). Even a plain and simple Google search would reveal an inkling of this — but I do not advise paying attention to Google, so whatever, nevermind.

It’s not lewd. It’s a newfangled word for “relationship” (without all of the “love”, “dating”, etc. attachments). It’s actually a quite ironic reversal of what average people might expect as to which term is more involved with heavy-hitting emotional baggage. Most people immediately see those four letters, and jump directly to prohibition.

But that’s all just introductory rambling on my mind.

Words (and the 8-letter string “fuckwith” is so commonly used, that it ought to be considered a word IMHO) make connections (I will spare you the details, but if you really want them, then go ahead and check out the work of super-smart dudes like Ludwig Wittgenstein and Noam Chomsky). When we express our thoughts with words, we make associations between the way we see things (and/or we describe relationships we recognise) in the real world.

The string “fuckwith” is especially ambivalent. Sometimes it means a clearly positive vibe, other times it means something like “fooling around” (or “messing around”), the way a so-called troll might behave. In both cases, it is very nonchalant.

Let me get to the point about why I started writing this post:

I came home and slept the best sleep I’ve had in weeks, filled with delightfully fun dreams

https://legendofvelda.com/2020/07/19/connections

Velda wrote that in part because of my work with words! 😯

When I tell people that words and natural language are actually the most basic information technology there is, they tend to ignore what I just told them. Then within like 5 minutes, they will type a brand name into their computer or smartphone and actually believe whatever the brand name tells them. Brands are not words. Words are trustworthy. Brands are distrustworthy.

The Oblivious Little Adventurer

Chuyện của tui, Nhạc nhẽo

Minh's avatarngocminh12697

When I was in pre-school, I asked for books on traffic laws and animals biology. I just wanted answers. I wanted to know more.

I also wandered around the neighbors in elementary school. Turned out the area I walked around was kinda sketchy. But I didn’t think much. I just wanted to see what’s out there, and then make my way to my friends where there would probably be banana pancakes.

Right around 2010, Paranormal Activity 2 came out. I remember being at my friend’s house, and we would watch it on her TV screen with maybe 10 or so others. I remember how noisy we were, and how it was comfortable surrounded by so many that even if a spirit came to drag one of us, the dozen of middle schoolers there would be able to fight back. I also remember I didn’t look at the screen that often…

View original post 620 more words